First, the frequency of meetings should be increased, especially in times of crisis, and the level of a few of these meetings enhanced. So, for example, two meetings a year at the head-of-government level and quarterly meetings at the finance-minister level would provide ample time for dialogue...I dont know if Raghuraman Rajan is going for a verbal charade - and at the last minute, spring the BRIC currency. What RRR is suggesting is not going to happen - is clear.Second, the IMF’s permanent Executive Board should be abolished. Important decisions should be vetted by the IMFC and others delegated to IMF management ...
Third, the obvious secretariat is the IMF. Unfortunately, the Fund is not regarded as being impartial, especially by countries that have been seared by its past conditionality. (via Global economy’s dialogue of the deaf- Opinion-The Economic Times).
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Global economy’s dialogue of the deaf- Opinion-The Economic Times
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment